#FINDING BIGFOOT GAME DO GUNS DO ANYTHING LICENSE#
“If the Commission does not specifically list an indigenous, non-game species, then the species is considered non-protected non-game wildlife A non-protected non-game animal may be hunted on private property with landowner consent by any means, at any time.”īecause Bigfoot isn’t recognized as an official species by the state of Texas, hunting one is technically allowed (with the proper license and permissions, of course). David Sinclair, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department's chief of staff, who responded to an email about the legalities of Bigfoot hunting in 2012. In Texas, for example, it is perfectly legal to hunt and kill Bigfoot. Not all places hold such a humanitarian attitude toward the mythical monster. The same amendment also named Bigfoot an endangered species in Skamania County and declared all land within their borders to be a “Sasquatch Refuge.”
More concerned with the safety of the latter than the former, the commissioners passed an official ordinance stating that slaying Bigfoot was a felony punishable by up to five years in prison.īy 1984 the Bigfoot craze had settled down and legislators recategorized the intentional murder of Bigfoot as a gross misdemeanor punishable by one year in prison and/or a $1000 fine. Not only did this pose a risk to potential Bigfoots, but it also threatened the residents living in these supposed Sasquatch hotspots.
Believers flooded the Pacific Northwest with plans to track down the stealthy beast-and, as the Board of County Commissioners soon noticed, many visitors brought dangerous hunting weapons with them. In 1969, two years after the release of the controversial Patterson-Gimlin film, the county found itself caught in the heat of peak Bigfoot fever. The first place to outlaw Bigfoot slaughter explicitly was Skamania County, Washington. It’s true that Sasquatch is legendary, but the cryptid still receives hypothetical legal protection in some parts of the country. Should Bigfoot hunters play dead? Lure it to civilization with beef jerky? Shoot it between the eyes and deliver it to their local taxidermist?īefore setting off on your next Bigfoot hunt, you might want to check with your state’s wildlife department. But for all the time and energy spent tracking the elusive creature, the proper protocol on what to do on the off-chance it’s found remains unclear.
#FINDING BIGFOOT GAME DO GUNS DO ANYTHING TV#
Traps, cable TV shows, and continent-wide organizations exist for the sole purpose of locating Bigfoot. Similarly, if the goal is to simply make scientists and the general public take Bigfoot seriously, then some verified remains of the creature – be they hair, teeth, blood, bones or something else – would do the trick.As long as there have been legends of mysterious ape men roaming the woods, there have been people determined to find them. If Standing, the "Finding Bigfoot" team, or anyone else shot well-lit, clear video of what was obviously a 12-foot-tall, hairy bipedal creature in the woods, that would be compelling.īut even the highest-quality photograph or video can't be considered definitive proof of Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, or any other mythical beast. The fatal flaw in Bigfoot photos and videos is the image quality, not the image subject.
It could have been anything – a guy in a dark jacket (or gorilla costume), a bear or even Bigfoot. Standing, like many Bigfoot researchers, misses the problem: It's not so much that any Bigfoot video is inherently worthless, it's that his video, like all that have come before it, is of such poor quality that there's no way to know what we're seeing.